Link This |
Email this |
Blog This |
Comments (3)
Social Networking Polarity
January 9, 2008
Social networking tools, and their vendors, have come under fire in recent years over an issue of trust. The dispute in question is whether or not social networking tools really work. Vendors claim a certain percentage rate of attendees who utilize these tools, but independent observations beg to differ. Interest in social networking boomed thanks to the success of MySpace and Facebook, but can the excitement and participation brought about by these sites be utilized for the Meetings industry? Everybody wants to say “yes," but the reality of the situation says “not yet."
Social networking, ideally, is good for the Meetings industry for a couple of reasons. They accelerate the sales process by enhancing lead generation opportunities. They connect buyers with sellers. They make introductions prior to an event so both parties can learn more about each other. In the end, these tools find a way to generate better qualified leads which in turn provide more closed deals. But, the problem is that not every attendee uses these tools.
The point of contention is the numbers vendors give and the results show organizers and exhibitors see.
Typically, people attend seminars and conferences to learn, and networking helps facilitate that process. For seminars, social networking is a benefit that attendees should, and do, take advantage of to get more out of their seminar experience.
On the other hand, people normally attend tradeshows to either buy or sell. Attendees map out their reasons for going and create an itinerary of people to meet, booths to visit, and panels to attend. For the tradeshow attendee, social networking is just not beneficial enough.
Simply put, seminar attendees want to take advantage of everything the seminar has to offer while tradeshow attendees are tunnel-visioned to their own goals. Of course, the real problem is probably a bit more complex, but this sociological disparity between seminar and tradeshow attendees is a good indicator of the general problem.
In the end, how do we solve the trust issue between the vendors and customers of social networking programs? Separating the data between the different types of meetings is a good place to start. Or, making social networking advantageous to all attendees in all types of meetings, thereby rising participation rates across the board, is another good place to start.
Posted by Stephen Nold on January 9, 2008 | Comments (3)
Industries:
Associations,
AV & Technology,
Catering,
Conferences,
CVBs & Venues,
Destinations,
Destinations,
Events,
Exhibiting,
Food & Beverage,
Management Update,
Meetings,
People,
People,
People,
People,
Production Technology,
Show Management,
Site Selection,
Speakers,
Speakers & Entertainment,
Technology,
Tradeshows,
Tradeshows